This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| 1 minute read

Maybe the 8th time will be the charm (for EPA to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act)

EPA Administrator Michael Regan certainly hit the nail on the head in his characterization of past EPA efforts to define "Waters of the United States" and thereby define the reach of the Clean Water Act.  And I think he is also absolutely correct that there is more common ground when it comes to what should be the reach of the Clean Water Act than one might think from the game of regulatory ping pong between recent Administrations.

Inside EPA reports that yesterday Administrator Regan told a Congressional Committee that the Biden Administration prefers neither the Obama Administration Waters of the United States rule nor the Trump Administration rule, the sixth and seventh EPA attempts to resolve what is the longest running controversy in environmental law.  This had to surprise Environmental NGOs and the Regulated Community, not to mention the White House National Climate Advisor who was responsible for the Obama Administration's rule when she held Mr. Regan's position.  

One has to wish Administrator Regan and EPA success in the eighth EPA attempt to define "Waters of the United States.  For now, the Trump Administration rule remains the rule, except for where it isn't, and uncertainty and litigation are rampant.  One also has to wonder whether Congress isn't a better place for negotiating the "will of the people". 

Responding to queries from Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) on WOTUS policy, Regan said he believes there is “more that unites us than divides us,” and said he is committed to learning lessons from the past. “We don’t have any intention of going back to the original Obama ‘Waters of the U.S.’ [policy] verbatim, and we don't necessarily agree with everything that was in the Trump administration's version as well. We have learned lessons from both. We have seen complexities in both and we have determined that both rules did not necessarily listen to the will of the people,” he added.

Tags

waters of the united states, clean water act, npdes, maui